Jan Kumstat vs Radovan Michalik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance: Michalik has won 40.48% of points on their second serve in the last six months, while Kumstat has a slightly better performance at 40.9%. Could this small edge impact the result?
• Return game stats: Michalik has won 47.92% of opponents' second serve points recently, compared to Kumstat's 48.08%. For first serve return, Michalik leads with 29.45% over Kumstat's 27.58%. Which of these stats will hold more weight?
• Under pressure: Michalik has saved 40.86% of breakpoints, while Kumstat is more resilient, saving 53.96%. Is Kumstat better equipped to handle high-pressure moments?
• Overall performance: Over the past year, Michalik has won 58.33% of matches, while Kumstat has a win rate of 56%. Does this suggest an evenly matched contest?
• Surface strengths: Michalik excels on clay with a 57% win rate, while Kumstat is most successful on indoor hard courts with a 60% win rate. Could the surface decide the winner?
• Match level: Michalik has played against generally higher-ranked opponents, 183.13 on average, compared to Kumstat's 378.68. Will experience against tougher opponents benefit Michalik?
• Set performance: In deciding sets, Kumstat holds a better record at 50% vs. Michalik's 42%. Will the match come down to a deciding set?
• Breakpoint conversion: Michalik has converted 41.67% of breakpoint opportunities, outperforming Kumstat who has a 33.57% conversion rate. Is Michalik more effective in crucial moments?

Editorial Prediction (August 8, 2025, UTC):

In a closely anticipated match, both players exhibit subtle yet potentially decisive strengths and weaknesses. In the realm of second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, Kumstat holds the upper hand with slightly better second serve points and stronger breakpoint defense.

Meanwhile, Michalik presents a formidable baseline return game, eclipsing Kumstat in both first and second serve returns, and taking control of breakpoint opportunities more effectively.

Taking into account surface preferences, Kumstat's advantage on indoor hard courts is undeniable, yet Michalik's experience against tougher competition might play a pivotal role.

Considering all factors, including Michalik's experience against higher-ranked opponents and higher breakpoint conversion rate, Michalik is favored to win this upcoming match.